Denial of the Race & IQ Nexus
After Arthur Jensen, professor of education at the University of California, published his article How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement? – in which he argued that race differences in intelligence were at least partially genetic – he was denounced, and in effect crucified by the press, his university, the American Psychological Association, and his colleagues as a “Nazi.” The Communist student organization, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), in particular had become so aggressive that Jensen began to be accompanied by two plain-clothes bodyguards.
Jensen wrote in the preface of his book Genetics and Education that he had been subject to a “storm of ideologically, often politically, motivated protests, misinterpretations, and vilifications”, similar to the ideological “struggle sessions” held against suspected capitalists in Mao’s Red China.
IQ Tests are Not Biased
Cultural Determinist Fake News
Mark Snyderman (of Harvard University) and Stanley Rothman (of Smith College) argued in their 1988 collaborative book The IQ Controversy, the Media, and Public Policy that mass media coverage of intelligence-related research is inaccurate, misleading, and characterized by liberal bias.
The two opine in the preface to the book that “the public’s view of the IQ controversy has been partly shaped by inaccurate media coverage” and “by changes in the nature of American liberalism” rather than by expert opinion. In regard to controversial scientific issues, they write that “the growing influence of new strategic elites and the changing role of the mass media have had a profound effect on the communication of scientific information to the public.”
They found that the media regularly presents the views of Stephen Jay Gould and Leon Kamin – both pseudoscientists who happened to also be ideologically motivated Marxist Jews – as representative of mainstream opinion among experts. In contrast, mainstream scientists who stress that individual and group differences are substantially genetic (e.g., Arthur Jensen, Richard Lynn, and J. Philippe Rushton) are characterized as a fringe minority.
Snyderman and Rothman surveyed over 1,000 randomly selected fellows and members of the American Psychological Association (APA), the American Educational Research Association, the Cognitive Science Society, and the Behavior Genetics Association. When possible, the sample was restricted to only doctorate holders.
The results of the survey were as follows:
The Genetic Cincher
The late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries witnessed an explosive acceleration in humanity’s understanding of molecular genetics, culminating in the mapping of the human genome and the discovery of the precise genetic basis of human traits and characteristics. In 2013, over forty American, European, and Canadian researchers published their discovery the of the single gene most responsible for intelligence – FNBP1L – in the journal Molecular Psychiatry. Other researchers corroborated their results in 2017.
In 2015 the hitherto relatively unknown researcher Davide Pfiffer showed that the FNBP1L gene, as well as several other genes associated with cognitive functionality (i.e., IQ), were more common in people of Northeast Asian descent than in people of European descent, and more common in people of European descent than in people of sub-Saharan African descent.
Intentionally destructive, hateful, virulent, and extreme left-wing and communist ideology was massively wrong the whole time.
Scientific Fraud and Wikipedia Lies
In accordance with Wikipedia’s policies on “reliable” and “fringe” sources, figures such as Rushton, Lynn, Jensen, and Levin were labeled as “unreliable” and “fringe” – and thus their perspectives are not included in the article on race and intelligence. In light of David Pfiffer’s 2015 discovery that the race and intelligence nexus is genetic, it becomes evident that the truth is precisely the opposite of what Wikipedia editors claim. Not only are Rushton, Lynn, et al. the reliable, mainstream scientific side, but figures such as Gould, Kamin, Rose, Lewontin, Neisser, Suzuki, Sternberg, et al. have now been discredited as ideologically motivated pseudoscientific hacks guilty of the pinnacle of scientific fraud. They are guilty of such because they set out to “prove” predetermined false conclusions instead of impartially subjecting hypotheses to the scientific method. In this light, not only do Gould et al. owe our side reparations, but they must also be stripped (whether posthumously or in vivo) of all credibility, repute, and academic standing for being complicit in what may be modern history’s greatest pseudoscientific fraud.
Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Sociopolitical Implications
The false claim that there were no race differences in IQ – or if there were, they did not have a genetic basis – was used by Jewish left-wing (such as Franz Boas) and a few other Marxist intellectuals to justify massive immigration from third-world jurisdictions into the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia.
It was also used to justify desegregation; while segregation was portrayed as a human rights abuse largely by the same Jews who practice it in Israel today, the result of desegregation was, predictably, an exponential explosion in crime statistics since the 1950s along with urban decay, chaos, and collapse throughout the United States and South Africa.
It was also used to funnel billions of dollars away from taxpayers into fiscally and structurally bloated remedial programs for American blacks, such as “Head Start and “No Child Left Behind.” However, the abject and catastrophic failure of these programs has made the reality of genetic IQ differences even more evident.